Spy vs. Spy

Any university professor following the normal practices of science, collaborating with colleagues from abroad, could have his career destroyed by what the NIST bureaucrats construe to be a violation of these elastic rules. The only safe course will be to “over-comply” deep-sixing many an innovation.

Advertisement

Readers of this letter will recall our celebration of what may turn out to be the most significant advance in microelectronics in 70 years: the first graphene semiconductor. This spectacular achievement was announced simultaneously, in January of this year, by a team of researchers from Georgia Tech and Tianjin University, China’s oldest. The discovery was the fruit of almost a decade of collaboration.

Today, neither the Chinese nor the American researchers would dare work together on such a project. Doesn’t that make you feel safe?

Ed Morrissey

It's an interesting argument, but not a compelling one. The campus agitation we see right now is fueled in part by massive amounts of foreign cash from unfriendly regimes that use their connections to Academia to help indoctrinate students into their political ideologies. China and Qatar (and Wahhabist Saudis in secondary education) have followed that strategy for many years and it's paying off for them with campus unrest now.

Besides, the example from 70 years ago has been eclipsed by the Wuhan Lab leak that killed millions around the world, the product of US-China collaboration. I feel a lot safer by ending that collaboration. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on HotAir Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement